Friday 10 February 2012

The news you're NOT supposed to see


This is an excellent collation of material  and analysis pointing to manipulation of the news and support for rebel groups designed to foment support for direct intervention - just like Libya!
This is literally the news you’re not supposed to know!
Thanks to Dr Deathcare, who contributes to Collapse Net!
Syria and the West - What you're not meant to know...

Caught red handed?......
"Nineteen Americans are among 43 workers from non-government organisations (NGOs) who have been sent for trial in an Egyptian criminal court over charges of illegally using foreign funds to encourage unrest in the country."


Bear in mind that Russia claims the west is doing the same thing in Syria....

Russia U.N. veto on Syria aimed at crushing West's crusade - Reuters

It's how BUSINESS is done, fund activist groups to buy their own arms and recruit, then sit and wait for the civilians to beg your country to go in and "save" them.

Gaining public support by showing you a bias view, and now that PressTV is off tv, we are no longer in a position to see the real situation after the government shut them down for showing the bbc up as a bunch of lying clowns, and the rest are just as bad...

But ask yourself this.....

Why did the Russia ambasssador go speak to the Syrian government when other countries were pulling out and getting ready for war?...

Is it so hard to believe that our secret governments are funding to create instability in countries that are experiencing the global uprising that has swept the planet. for their own ends?

US Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will visit Egypt amid tensions over Cairo’s accusations against 19 US pro-democracy workers. Dempsey will hold security talks this week with counterpart Lt. Gen. Sami Anan and top Egyptian military leader, Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi, AP said. Dempsey’s spokesman, Col. Dave Lapan, said on Wednesday the visit is long-planned. He added the top Pentagon general was not going to press Cairo to drop the charges against the nonprofit workers. But Lapan admitted that the dispute is likely to come up in the talks.


So the U.S says, "if you prosecute our people whom you have arrested for being foreigners helping to destablise the country, then we will stop aid to your country"....

Egypt PM dismisses US aid threat over activists' trial - BBC

"Arming Syrian rebels to oust Bashar Assad's ruling regime has not been 'completely ruled out' by the Pentagon, the U.S. State Department has revealed."....

Pentagon weighing up military options in Syria as shelling of Homs ...

You've already done it... Just tell the truth.!.... But why?......

"To win world sympathy and trigger intervention" – this is a purported quote from secret UN reports and memos concerning the Sarajevo bombings, explaining the motives for the (alleged) provocation.

Fast forward to February 2012

Here are the headlines from the eve of the crucial UN Security Council vote on Syria:

The WaPo: "Syrian government forces launched a mortar and rocket assault on the country’s third-largest city Friday night that activists said killed more than 200 people, intensifying pressure on the UN Security Council as it prepares to vote on a measure aimed at ending a bloody government crackdown.”

The Guardian: "Fury over Homs massacre as UN security council gathers for Syria vote"

Reuters: "Death toll hits 217 in shelling of Syria's Homs – group"

Does anybody think that Assad and his generals are so incredibly dumb as to shell the town on the eve of voting at the United Nations?

Did anybody notice that the source of information is a British-based group composed of sworn enemies of Assad? Or that the dateline on most stories reads "Damascus" or "Beirut" – not Homs?

To be sure, Assad and his security people are not Salvation Army do-gooders. During civil wars the sides rarely are. And when the civil war is augmented by religious strife, things get even worse.

Here, however, is a comparison that Reuters, WaPo, the Guardian and the rest would be too shy to make.

The date is April 28, 2003. A crowd of Sunni Muslims gather to vent their grievances, some of them armed, as is customary in their area. Suddenly there is gunfire from the rooftops, killing 17 people on the spot, and wounding dozens. Homs? Evil tyrant regime killing civilians? Would Susan Rice be outraged?

We don't think so. If you figured out by now what event we are talking about – congratulations. You most likely won't fall for her fake outrage.

For the rest, we’ll explain that the town was Fallujah, Al Anbar Province, Iraq; the soldiers on the rooftops were war-weary, jumpy paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne US Army who – yes – overreacted in the worst possible way. By the way, we are not aware of any arrests or legal prosecution of the soldiers involved. The 82nd was rotated out of Al Anbar and replaced by the US infantry.

Many say that that's how the insurgency in Iraq started – the tribal Sunnis of Al Anbar were not ready to accept the rules, whatever they might be, imposed by foreign invaders. They were even less ready to be machine-gunned by the "bringers of democracy."

But back to the "Homs massacre"

WHAT (REAL) REPORTERS ON THE GROUND WOULD NOT TELL YOU

Any reporter who has ever covered the conflicts in the Middle East knows that propaganda and counter propaganda are an essential part of waging a power struggle. And accepts it as such.

Here is an excerpt from the official Report of the Head of the League of Arab States Observer Mission to Syria for the period from 24 December 2011 to 18 January 2012.

- The Mission noted that many parties falsely reported that explosions or violence had occurred in several locations. When the observers went to those locations, they found that those reports were unfounded.

- The Mission also noted that, according to its teams in the field, the media exaggerated the nature of the incidents and the number of persons killed in incidents and protests in certain towns.

THEY'VE DONE IT BEFORE

Remember the "Nayirah scam" of 1990? The girl testified that she had personally seen Saddam Hussein’s soldiers throw babies out of incubators in a Kuwaiti hospital, leaving them to die. All the corporate media ran with it and international human rights organizations "corroborated" her story.

By 1992, the whole thing was revealed to be a clear-cut hoax with "Nayirah" being unmasked as the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States and nowhere near the Iraqi soldiers.

But the job was done – and the Desert Storm counter-invasion enjoyed massive support with the public in the West…

The marketplace massacres in Sarajevo are and remain a much more convoluted story.

There were three big explosions in the markets of the Bosnian capital: on May 27 1992, February 5 1994 and August 28 1995. In each, dozens of civilians were killed. Each time, horrendous pictures of maimed or dying civilians filled TV screens, eliciting universal condemnation from the world community.

And there were repercussions.

The first explosion led to UN SC Resolution 757 that imposed harsh penalties on Yugoslavia.

The second and third led to NATO air strikes on Bosnian Serbs that by some accounts (also unverified) created more civilian casualties than the marketplace explosions themselves. The third, in 1995, led to the NATO air strikes which coincided with an all-out assault by Bosnia on Serb positions. Some say that was not a coincidence at all.

Two key international players – UN Secretary General Boutros-Ghali and the French president – clearly had their doubts over the veracity of the "Serbian massacre" stories, but kept them to themselves, supporting the NATO air strikes instead.

Only in 1996, after the Dayton peace agreement was signed, did Francois Mitterrand reveal all in his book L'Annee des Adieux. In a telling quote, he said: "A few days ago Mr. Boutros Ghali told me that he was sure that the shell which hit the Markale marketplace in Sarajevo was an act of Bosnian Muslim provocation."



UK TROOPS ALREADY IN SYRIA AIDING REBELS

British and Qatari troops are directing rebel ammunition deliveries and tactics in the bloody battle for Homs, according to an Israeli website known for links to intelligence sources.
The Site also claims that British and Qatari special operations units are operating with rebel forces under cover in the Syrian city of Homs just 162 kilometers from Damascus.

The presence of the British and Qatari troops was seized on by Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan for the new plan he unveiled to parliament in Ankara Tuesday, Feb. 7.

Treating the British-Qatari contingents as the first foreign foot wedged through the Syrian door, his plan hinges on consigning a new Turkish-Arab force to Homs through that door and under the protection of those contingents.

Four centers of operation have been established in the city with the troops on the ground paving the way for an undercover Turkish military incursion into Syria



An intelligence report has revealed that British and Qatari troops are leading armed terror gangs in the Syrian city of Homs in their bloody battle against civilians and the Syrian army forces.

British troops involved in Homs operation
 - PressTV

and once Syria falls and the west puts a base in there, either our own or an ally, then they will be ready.....

A former US official says Washington is deploying military forces around Iran and calling off its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to prepare for a strike on Iran.

Washington has made tremendous preparations for a military assault on Iran,” Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during Ronald Reagan's presidency, wrote in an article titled “Will Iran Be Attacked? 44 US military bases surrounding Iran...” published on the Global Research website.





See also:


"What we are seeing is horrendous. The result will probably be bloody, and unfortunately the Russians are backing him," Selim Yenel told Reuters late on Wednesday, emphasizing that Turkey was doing what it could to support Syria's opposition groups, short of giving them arms or other military assistance

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.