The
Denial of Climate Scientists and Experts
Climate
change can’t be stopped or reversed. So why are climate scientists
sounding so hopeful?
Mike
Sliwa
6 March, 2016
I
am not a scientist. I don’t play one on TV. I follow climate
science a tad more than the average person. What I’ve discovered
however is a pattern. A pattern that is soaking in denial. This
denial comes in the form of fear and hope. Fear is the bedrock of the
industrial culture. Hope is the devil’s greatest trick. Today’s
climate scientists and experts are scared to death of not only losing
their careers but possibly their lives from fanatics. In a culture
that doesn’t believe in death but believes deeply in progress,
these folks peddle hope because they believe it’s their only option
and because they can make some serious money along the way.
On
a recent episode of Real
Time with Bill Maher, one
of worlds foremost climate scientists, Dr.
Michael Mann repeated
the fear and hope mantra. Maher began by discussing Obama’s climate
plan which includes cutting emissions (power plant, mainly coal) by
32% by the year 2030. His first question to Mann was, “Won’t we
all be dead by then?” Mann replied, “No, the good news is um,
we’re still at the point where we can make the sort of cuts in our
carbon emissions that we need to, to make sure we don’t get
irreversible dangerous climate change.” Like many climate
scientists he spews the venom of hope by informing people that it’s
not the midnight hour and we need to get serious about the
climate right now. To his credit, Bill Maher played the realist
during the interview by pointing out that NASA climate scientist Dr.
James Hanson gave
a similar response 10 years earlier. Will there come a day when
climate scientists tell us the truth?
Dr.
Hanson is a proponent of a revenue-neutral
fee and dividend system which
imposes a price on carbon that returns the money collected from the
fossil fuel industry equally to all legal residents of the United
States. According to Hanson,
“The solution [climate change] has to be a rising price on carbon and then the real dirty fuels like tar sands would fall on the table very quickly.” Hanson also supports efficient energy use, renewable energy, smart grid technology, generation IV nuclear reactors, and carbon capture and storage. He, like Mann, will discuss anything but the truth of the matter. Climate change has no solution.
The change that is occurring and the abrupt change that is our future is already baked into the cake.
“The solution [climate change] has to be a rising price on carbon and then the real dirty fuels like tar sands would fall on the table very quickly.” Hanson also supports efficient energy use, renewable energy, smart grid technology, generation IV nuclear reactors, and carbon capture and storage. He, like Mann, will discuss anything but the truth of the matter. Climate change has no solution.
The change that is occurring and the abrupt change that is our future is already baked into the cake.
It
doesn’t matter if it’s 350.org founder Bill
McKibben, or 350.org board
of directors and best selling author, Naomi
Klein,
the story of false hope remains
the same.
Never question the story we tell ourselves about ourselves and
continue to negotiate with the non-negotiable. Climate Scientist, Dr.
Katherine Hayhoe also sings the
praises of
renewable energy since the U.S. military (considered by many to be
the largest consumer of petroleum in the world) is pursuing such an
endeavor. It’s the same story that Stanford’s Mark
Z. Jacobson
tells. He is a renewable advocate as well. Hayhoe and Jacobson,
like all the aforementioned, believe in a human centric narrative and
more importantly, a civilized narrative.
They don’t want to abandon
the machine, just refine it. This narrative is our predicament yet we
continue to believe that it is a solution to the very problems it
creates. Read that again and one can begin to see the tough spot we
are truly in.
When an individual’s livelihood, reputation and self-esteem depend upon the institution … the truth then becomes secondary. What is the truth you may ask? I suggest to find out you take a few hours and sit in your local mall. Find a seat on a bench and just observe the masses. After about an hour start to ponder some of these questions: Why are people at the mall? What are they buying? Where do these items come from? How are they manufactured?
Where
do these products go after we dispose of them? What impact do these
products have on people, the planet and the climate. You don’t have
to be a climate scientist or an expert in the field to see what is
happening. We live in a global industrial economy that is devouring
the world and one of the most severe consequences is abrupt climate
change. How do we respond? By digging ourselves in deeper.
Today
the folks we turn to when we need important and timely information
about climate consequences are nothing more than frightened pawns or
opportunists who are swimming in institutional rhetoric. Some have of
them are making a pretty decent living spinning our false narrative.
These men and women have been attacked and even propped up by the
status quo. Some have sold their
souls to
the corporation. Some believe deeply in the narrative called hope.
None of them seem willing to tell us what’s actually happening. We
are tired of cowards.
We are tired of people peddling bullshit. We
want honesty and integrity. We can handle the truth. We have no
choice
Mike
Sliwa is
a husband and homesteader. He taught high school for 12 years and
left his career for a simpler existence. Currently he and his wife
are living off grid, perfecting their durable living skills in rural
New Mexico. Mike speaks about a wide variety issues concerning simple
living, white privilege,abrupt
climate change, Near Term Human Extinction, and other consequences of
the civilized industrial global economy. He's also a co-host for the
radio program, Nature Bats Last on the Progressive Radio Network
(Prn.fm) and co-founder of the social justice speaking
agency truality.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.